The Bridge: The Right to Choose What We Eat

Rural Vermont Drafts Food Sovereignty Resolution
SEPTEMBER 15–OCTOBER 5, 2011
By Sylvia Fagin
Full Article (See page 5)

Does an individual really have the right to eat whatever he or she wants to eat? This is the fundamental question behind Rural Vermont’s food sovereignty campaign. Rural Vermont, the statewide group dedicated to advancing economic justice for Vermont farmers through advocacy and education, is ramping up a campaign to encourage towns and villages to consider the issue of food sovereignty at their 2012 town meetings, according to Robb Kidd, an organizer with the group. Sovereignty means supreme authority. Considering the
issue of food sovereignty, Rural Vermont takes this position:

“We declare the right of communities to produce, process, sell and purchase local foods. In recognition of Vermont’s traditional agricultural systems, we assert these vital principles
as the foundation of local Food Sovereignty.”

This current effort stems from Rural Vermont’s past statewide advocacy work on issues including meat-processing regulation and the right to buy and sell raw milk. Much of
Rural Vermont’s work focuses on ways consumers can purchase food directly from farmers. “In a lot of our work, we’re running into legislative dead ends and federal rules and regulations that don’t allow any more growth in the market,” Kidd said. He noted that the recently released Farm-to-Plate plan reports that only 5 percent
of the food consumed in Vermont is produced in Vermont.

“How are we going to change that?” Kidd asked. “Big food trucks still rumble into Montpelier daily.”

In order for Vermonters to be able to buy more food from their farmer-neighbors, some regulations, both state and federal, will have to change, Kidd said. The first step is educating more people about the issues.

“Even though there’s a lot of support from Vermont politicians, we feel there needs to be a vast culture change,” Kidd said. “One way to do this is in communities themselves. This
campaign is about bringing the message to town halls, to get this issue talked about on a greater level.”

Town Meeting Day discussions serve to inform a greater number of Vermonters on the details of a particular issue, Kidd said, citing past Town Meeting Day topics such as nuclear
power. Rural Vermont is encouraging towns and villages to consider a food sovereignty resolution at their town meeting in 2012 and to adopt resolution language that speaks specifically to the individual community’s history and direction regarding
food and agriculture. “For example, a town may have had a slaughter facility and want to address that issue,” Kidd said.

As a first step, Kidd has convened a group of Montpelier residents to draft a food-sovereignty petition to present to Montpelier voters on Town Meeting Day in March 2012.

The Montpelier group continues to meet to discuss how to build support for this petition. Kidd hopes that the Montpelier petition will build momentum that will spread to other communities. A lot of people are interested, he said. “I could see 15 to 50 towns taking
it on,” he estimated. “Ideally, I’d like to have 250 towns take it on. Even if they all rejected it, they’d have had a conversation about it.”

With this campaign, Rural Vermont aims to build grassroots community support to enable legislators to take a stronger stand on tough agricultural issues, Kidd said. “We want to give legislators the political capital to make tougher decisions or address issues that aren’t being addressed now.”

Kidd introduced the food sovereignty campaign at the Growing Local Fest in Montpelier on September 10. Many attendees were supportive of the effort.

“This is an issue that unites left and right, because there is nothing more fundamental than feeding ourselves,” said Josh Schlossberg of East Montpelier. Rich Scharf of Duxbury agreed: “The decisions about what

This entry was posted in Agriculture in the News, Food Sovereignty News. Bookmark the permalink.